Faculty Advisor(s)

Michelle Adams

Download

Download Full Text (344 KB)

Abstract

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are the two primary revascularization options for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although advances in PCI technology have led to improved outcomes and increased survival rates, CABG continues to be the preferred option for many patients due to its favorable long-term outcomes. This project examines the key differences between CABG and PCI, including their indications, contraindications, and clinical applications. Quality of life data indicate early benefits with PCI but more sustained improvement with CABG, especially beyond the first year. Findings from the SYNTAX study highlight that PCI is appropriate for patients with uncomplicated left main disease, whereas CABG demonstrates superior outcomes when disease burden is extensive. Technological advancements, including improved stent designs, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), have enhanced PCI results but have not eliminated CABG’s advantages in high-risk cases.

Keywords: CABG, PCI, coronary artery disease, revascularization, SYNTAX score, quality of life, cardiovascular interventions

Publication Date

2025

Document Type

Poster

Department

Medical Imaging

Keywords

CABG, PCI, coronary artery disease, revascularization, SYNTAX score, quality of life, cardiovascular interventions

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Cardiac Catheterization: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Share

COinS